Westchester Institute
Human Embryo Adoption: Biotechnology, Marriage, and the Right to Life

Human Embryo Adoption:
Biotechnology, Marriage, and the Right to Life
Edited by Rev. Thomas V. Berg and Edward J. Furton
With a foreword by Robert P. George
ISBN# 0-935372-50-4

Now available! Click here to order on-line

Human Ebryo AdoptionAvailable for $24.95 plus S&H from the
National Catholic
Bioethics Center.

phone: 215.877.2660
fax 215.877.2688
e-mail: info@ncbcenter.org

or regular mail:

Book orders:
National Catholic Bioethics Center
6399 Drexel Road Philadelphia , PA 19151




 

“Catholic philosophers and theologians defending all sides of the ‘embryo adoption’ debate make a tremendous contribution to the Church in this volume. Those perplexed by the debate need look no further to find out what it is about—and those taking one side or the other may discover that it is not as simple as they thought.”

~ Richard Doerflinger
~Deputy Director, Pro-Life Secretariat, USCCB

 
With Good Reason

Final column-at least for a while
December 21, 2010 9:00 am

I penned my first 'With Good Reason' column a bit over four years ago in November of 2006. At the time, my hope was to make a solid contribution toward curbing our cultural malaise which is, in myriad ways, so adverse to reasoned consideration of our beliefs, policies and behaviors. Such a culture-as I suggested at the time-cannot sustain for long a thriving and well-ordered democratic way of life.

And so it is, in that deeper-than-usual nostalgia and spirit of reflection which envelopes most of us (or me at least) at this time of year, that I now sit me down to pen my final WGR column.

No, I have not given up on the battle for reasoned discourse in the public square! On the contrary, of late I have had reason to be encouraged. And over the past four years, there have been any number of Baby_Handindicators that reasoned public discourse on moral matters is experiencing a refreshing revival of sorts. One might consider, for example, howbaby hand the advent of embryonic stem cell research occasioned the lively and vigorous public debate about the moral status of the human embryo, a debate that had been effectively squelched during the first decades of the debate over abortion.

In ending my monthly columns, I am certainly not disappearing from the ethics scene. On the contrary, other commitments (the ethics boards on which I sit, research and writing commitments-including my hopes of publishing a book or two-as well as teaching and pastoral work) are simply occupying my time to such an extent that I have elected to give them greater attention. Publishing will continue, of course, albeit in other venues.

But back to that reflective mood.

liu-xiaobo-200X200I write on a day that the headlines tell us: Liu XiaoboChinese human rights activist Liu Xiaobo (himself jailed and his wife under house arrest) was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in absentia in Oslo; pressure mounts in Washington to cut federal spending as lawmakers finally step up to take action at the prospect of hitting national bankruptcy by 2025; 16 year-olds are conducting a cyber war on major American businesses; scientists have created a mouse whose genetic makeup comes from two males; the debate over the military's 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' policy is at the forefront on Capitol Hill even as our service men and women continue to be killed by IED's; and North Korean aggression toward South Korea is growing, not diminishing.

Plenty to write about.

Truly, there's never an end to the challenges facing humanity and which call for reasoned moral discourse in the public square.

Looking back on four years of non-stop "issues" to which I dedicated my key pad and best mental energies, I can't help but wonder again at those enduring questions that underlie the issues: What is truth? Why am I here? Why do we suffer? Is there a God?

Now, if truth be told, any day of the week, we can glance at the news and wonder if the headlines do not portend a new and rapidly advancing dark age, or whether-as the philosopher Aladair MacIntyre already opined three decades ago in his now classic After Virtue -that the new dark age is already upon us, and whether its barbarian doyens "are not waiting beyond the frontiers [but] have already been governing us for quite some time."

However one parses the present age, as Christians we are called-in the spirit of St. Augustine-to sing, and not curse the darkness, as we strive to build the City of God, and journey toward the consummation of all times. We are called to hope, and hope entails patient expectation.

To borrow again from MacIntyre, however, we are certainly not waiting for Godot; Christian expectation is infused, through and through, with meaning. As to MacIntyre's suggestion that we are rather awaiting a new St. Benedict, well, that would surely be nice.

But far more importantly, all of us are hopefully awaiting "the blessed hope-the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ."

He alone is the Word of the Father, the Logos through whom all things were made.

He alone is the font of Wisdom in whom we participate through our right use of reason.

He alone is the ultimate answer to the deepest questions of the human heart.

That's why, at Christmas 2010 we cry, once again: "Marana tha! Come Lord Jesus!"

God bless you.

And... P.S....As one smidgen of that hope, treat yourself to this on YouTube. Merry Christmas!

***
Bookmark and Share


 
Scholars Forum

Robert GeorgeThe Scholars Forum moderated by Dr. Robert George, brings together a selection of the world's leading ethicists, moral theologians, scientists and scholars from related fields to work together toward resolving some of the most difficult moral questions facing mankind. These invitation-only gatherings are designed to foster the highest degree of sustained and fruitful dialogue among those scholars most competent to resolve the ethical questions under discussion.

To date, the Westchester Institute has hosted seven such gatherings. To learn more about each Scholars Forum, please select the following links.

 

November 6-7, 2008
The Church’s Competence in Applying the Norms of Natural Law

 

April 10-11, 2008
When do we Die? Brain Death, Irreversible Circulatory Cessation, and the Debate over the End of Life.

 

May 16 - 18, 2007
On the Criteria for Determining the Totipotency of the Human Embryo

 

October 26 - 27, 2006
On De Facto Unions and Same Sex "Marriage"

 

March 2 - 3, 2006
On the Definition of 'Human Embryo' and the Criteria for Distinguishing the Human Embryo From Non-Embryonic Entities

 

November 3 -4, 2005
On the Morality of Condom use to Prevent the Spread of HIV 

 

April 28 -29, 2005
On the Morality of Altered Nuclear Transfer

 

October 28-29, 2004
On the Morality of Heterologous Embryo Transfer

 
White Paper. Emergency Contraceptives & Catholic Healthcare
whitePaper_1008The question of the licitness of providing “emergency contraceptives” to victims of
sexual assault who present in the emergency rooms at Catholic hospitals is a critical
matter for evaluating and developing appropriate protocols for sexual assault victims.
An examination of the available scientific studies demonstrates that the most common
emergency contraceptive—Plan B, generally administered to prevent ovulation—at
times may fail to prevent conception from taking place and instead may prompt an
early abortion. This necessitates answering the question of when, and under what
circumstances, it is morally licit to provide contraceptive medications to sexual assault
victims while avoiding the potential outcome of prompting an early abortion.

 

download acrobat readerDownload the full White Paper (526k pdf)

Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader - Download Now