2010 Archive
- A Legal Bombshell Hits Stem Cell Science
- Have Stem Cells Become Passé?
- Illegal Immigration and Catholic Social Teaching
- The Difference God Makes
- How are Christians to Engage the Culture?
- In Vitro Fertilization - Why Not?
- The Long Ascent to Calvary
- Healthcare, Human Life and America
- Why I Didn’t Give Up Facebook for Lent
- Our Sex-Crazed Culture
- The Unimportance of Sex
- Recovery in the Big Easy
- Catholic Teaching on Assisted Nutrition and Hydration
- Haiti
- What’s Wrong With Us?
- Challenging Totalitarianism in 2010
| Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures - 7 |
|
Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures - 7
He begins by reminding us that the foregoing historical and philosophical critique of Enlightenment thought is not tantamount to a rejection of the Enlightenment and Modernity. On the contrary, Benedict reiterates a theme deeply entwined in the message of the Second Vatican Council, namely, that Christianity, as "the religion of the Logos " and "a religion in keeping with reason," shares much common ground with the best that Enlightenment thought had to offer. Christianity and Enlightenment have shared the aspiration to be "open to all that is truly rational." But again, Benedict cogently insists that their apparent irreconcilability is reducible to a disagreement about the nature and scope of human reason:
Benedict holds that Christians must continue to engage a secularized culture with a vision of reality in which rational activity, human consciousness, and the experience of freedom, far from being understood as the bi-product of mindless biochemical evolution, are in fact the product of "creative reason", gifts of the Logos to humanity. And on the basis of such a positive vision, and in the light of his foregoing commentary, Benedict ends Part I , with a challenge. He recalls that some Enlightenment thinkers responded to the religious and intellectual upheavals of their day by trying to shield the fundamental tenets of the moral life from similar scrutiny and upheaval by suggesting that "even if God did not exist" ( etsi Deus non daretur ) those moral tenets would still be true -for all peoples, in all times and places. In the wake of the tragedies spawned by modern and contemporary God-less secularism, the Holy Father ends by suggesting that today secularists would be wise to do just the opposite, "to live as if God existed" (veluti si Deus daretur). 'Pascal's wager', as it is traditionally called, is ever enticing. To live as if God did exist-perhaps it is on the basis of such a wager that both believers and non-believers, secularists and non-secularists, can yet today find common cause in any number of worthy enterprises for the betterment of the human family, and build a culture worthy of persons endowed with logos. ***
|

