2008 Archive
- My Wish List for Christmas 2008
- Protecting Conscience in Healthcare
- Digitalized Decadence
- Will Obama’s Policies Reduce Abortions in America?
- Of Hope, Change and Reason
- Joe the Embryo: Considering what hangs in the balance today
- Expect Obama to Sign FOCA in the first 100 days
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures - 4
- The Most Important Issue--Revisited
- So what's the most important issue?
- Abortion Changes You
- An advocate for all of us
- Catholics, Human Life and the Vote
- Seventh Anniversary: 9/11 and the Current State of Jihadism
- Stem Cell News We Can't Afford to Miss
- End of Summer Reading - Father Thomas's Selections to Feed the Mind and Soul
- Critical Thinking About the Role Science is Playing in American Politics and Culture
- Conscience Protections in Healthcare
- Moral Conscience - Part III
- Moral Conscience - Part II
- Moral Conscience - Part I
- Political Responsibility - Catholic Style
- What Americans Think About Embryo Research
- Toward the New Serfdom
- America and Jihad--A Gathering Storm?
- America and Jihad--where do we stand?
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures - 10
- Developmental Biology
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures -9
- Benedict at Ground Zero
- What Will Benedict Tell America?
- When Do We Die?
- Morality and the Emerging Field of Moral Psychology
- When it is Reasonable to Say 'No' to Unreason
- Morality as Genetic Predisposition and Neurobiology
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures - 8
- McNihilism goes to church (when it feels like it)
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures - 7
- Reason in the Public Square, Part II
- Reason in the Public Square, Part I
- Just when you thought you understood
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures - 6
- The Many Meanings of 'Freedom' and 'Liberty'
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures -5 Enlightenment Culture
- Roe v. Wade at 35
- Faith, Reason and Jihad
- A Papal Appeal to Natural Law
2007 Archive
- Speaking "Rationally and Softly"
- My Wish List for Christmas 2007
- Religion and Public Life
- The Beginning of The End of the Stem Cell Wars?
- IPSCS: What the Scientists are Saying
- Eliminating Down Babies
- Of 'Moral Ecology' and the Human Embryo
- Bush Administration Mandates Definition
- Time to Get Real About Stem Cell Research
- The Age of "Savior Siblings"
- The Fate of Frozen Embryos
- What's Up With Higher Ed?
- 9/11 Jihadism and Reason
- Suffer the Children
- We’re Closer to Getting Pluripotent Cells out of Normal Adult Body Cells
- Stem Cells, the Presidential Candidates and the Bush Principles
- Atheists: A Summer to Stand Up, Be Proud, and 'Come Out.'
- Back to the Future: Eugenics
- When Science Goes Offside
- Religion vs. Science? Look More Deeply
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures - 10
- Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: What if?
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures -9
- Yearning to Blast a Hole in the World
- What the Senate Vote Meant
- Altered Nuclear Transfer
- Alternatives to Embryo-Destructive Research
- Thoughts for Good Friday
- Embryo-Friendly Stem Cell Research
- Teach the Bible as Literature?
- Hitting Rewind II
- Another Stem Cell Fact
- Hitting Rewind
- Got Natural Law?
- Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures - 8 "God saw...And behold it was very good."
| Hitting Rewind II |
|
Hitting Rewind II A couple weeks ago I was talking about one of the most promising alternative sources of human "pluripotent" stem cells called direct cell reprogramming. It holds out the possibility of producing embryonic-like stem cells, but without destroying, harming, or even involving human embryos in the process. Reprogramming (also called de-differentiation) proposes to take adult cells from the human body and send each cell's nucleus back to a pluripotent state, meaning that each of these cells would then be capable of producing any tissue type in the human body-virtually equivalent in versatility to human embryonic stem cells.
Furthermore, these stem cells would be genetically matched to the person who donated the body cells. They could then be used to grow tissues for future use in tissue replacement therapies (everything from regeneration of damaged heart tissue to Parkinson's to spinal chord injury). A perfect genetic match, these tissues would not be rejected by the donor's immune system. Most importantly, there would be no embryo created, destroyed, damaged or used in any way at any point in the process. As I mentioned in the previous e-column on this topic, in August 2006, the journal Cell published research by a Japanese team of researchers lead by Shinya Yamanaka. In that research, Yamanaka reported successes in reprogramming mouse cells by altering just four genetic factors in those cells. In so doing, the team was able to demonstrate that the new cells had pluripotent-like qualities. I recently asked Westchester Institute senior fellow Dr. Markus Grompe to comment on the significance of Yamanaka's work and whether anyone has yet replicated it? Here's what Markus had to say:
Markus further confirmed that perhaps as many as 50 labs around the world, and upwards of 200 stem cell researchers, are currently pursuing cell reprogramming. He also confirmed that, if successful, cell reprogramming holds out the same promise as so called "therapeutic cloning", meaning that the end product-patient-specific, genetically matched tissue-would be similar if not identical to what scientists would hope to achieve through cloning. When I asked him how long it would likely take before we see published research on successful attempts to do this with human cells, he prognosticated 2008 or 2009 at the latest-but was quick to add: "Success is in the eye of the beholder, however." ***
|

